Validate realistic attack paths through authorised, controlled testing and translate technical findings into prioritised remediation. This page explains how the services connect, where each one begins and ends, and which route is most useful for a specific business decision.
Explore our services.
Cybersecurity problems rarely fit one tool or one project. The services below are organised as a coherent family, while each engagement keeps its own objective, scope, evidence and acceptance criteria.
Use this page to choose a direction, then open the relevant service page for detailed methodology, deliverables, limitations and frequently asked questions.
01
External and internal penetration testing evaluates whether an authorised attacker could gain access to infrastructure, escalate privileges, move through the environment or reach sensitive assets.
02
Cloud penetration testing simulates authorised attacker behaviour against cloud-hosted workloads, identities and control planes to validate exploitable risk.
03
Web, API and mobile application security testing examines how an attacker could abuse application logic, interfaces, identities, data flows and client-side controls.
04
Exercise people, process and technology against realistic threat objectives through controlled red-team operations and measurable outcomes.
05
Latest researches in the industry demonstrate that successful social engineering attacks are responsible for 70% of all breaches that lead to substantial data loss or information leaks.
1. Define the decision, risk or assurance objective.
2. Confirm scope, evidence, systems, stakeholders and exclusions.
3. Select only the assessment or implementation components that support the objective.
4. Deliver management conclusions and technical actions with clear ownership.
5. Validate remediation or establish an agreed review cadence where ongoing support is required.
An assessment establishes the current position; design and implementation change the control environment; and validation confirms the result. We from CTG recommend only the components needed for the stated objective.
Other CTG families may provide supporting evidence or remediation. Cross-family work is added only when the dependency is real and the customer can see the separate value.
Choose a focused service when the objective and scope are already clear. Use a maturity, risk or architecture assessment when priorities first need to be established. Where needs recur, agree ownership, data handling, escalation and reporting as part of the engagement.
Request a scoping consultation with us to identify the smallest useful starting point and define a programme with evidence, accountable ownership and measurable outcomes.
No. Each service can be scoped independently. The hub shows the relationships so that organisations can avoid gaps and unnecessary overlap.
Yes, when they support one objective and retain clear ownership, deliverables, dependencies and acceptance criteria.
Begin with the decision that must be made: understand the current position, validate a technical risk, implement a control, prepare for a requirement or operate a recurring capability.
No. Applicable frameworks and requirements are selected during scoping. Legal interpretation, accredited certification and statutory audit remain separate where required.
English and Bulgarian content and customer deliverables can be supported. The proposal confirms the working language and any specialist translation requirements.
